I agree entirely with Jkeaton. It is a very tedious book written by a dishonest researcher. I have been following Don Tapscott since his early experiments with Telidon and Emerald City in the 1980s. He is a man on a mission: go against the grain. He has been doing this since (and likely before) his activist days in University. It is a sad comment on the intelligentsia that few can see through his sham science. Anecdotes do not make research. Objective scientific enquiry begins with an hypothesis and not a conclusion. Tapscott is a fraud, and an arrogant one at that. Read the book if you want, but I would classify it as fiction.
Comment
Grown Up Digital